I hadn't thought of using Types.isSubsignature and I think that might improve my code. Namely, javac doesn't consider that an inherited abstract method can override an interface method.īy spelling out the override logic rather than relying on Elements.override, we should be able to preserve the ordering between the two compilers and also future-proof against changes to what Elements.override does. I think there's an extra rule beyond the ones spelled out in "An instance method m C declared in or inherited by class C, overrides from C another method m I declared in an interface I" in 8.4.8.1. My impression from this reimplementation is that there is at least one case where javac's decisions are not strictly equivalent to what the JLS says. That way we're no longer affected by inconsistencies between the javac and ecj versions of overrides. (I know this for a fact based on Google's internal usages.) The approach I've been working on is to reimplement Elements.overrides using other methods from Elements and Types. The Milestones and Release Candidate dates are defined in the Simultaneous Release Plan. If we changed any detail of that order we would break a lot of existing code. Final Simultaneous Release repository and EPP packages - produced at end of RC4. I think we are in a situation where we have to preserve the existing order, determined by MoreElements using javac's .Elements. This lab has two main objectives: (1) introduce you to the Eclipse IDE, and (2) show you what Java library source code looks like. How do I get Eclipse to resolve classes generated with Maven 2 Replace spaces with tabs using Eclipse How to create the pom.xml for a Java project with.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |